Should OPG be required to improve radioactive waste storage?

We want to know what you think about storing radioactive waste on the Lake Ontario waterfront at the Darlington Nuclear Station. Please answer the following questions and then click Vote.

Should Ontario Power Generation (OPG) be allowed to expand conventional storage warehouses to store deadly radioactive waste on the shore of Lake Ontario or should it be required to build above-ground, attack-resistant, reinforced concrete vaults to store this waste?

Should be required to build reinforced concrete vaults
Warehouses are ok, but should not be next to the lake
OPG’s plan for warehouses is fine because it will save the company money

The Nuclear Waste Management Organization says radioactive waste will remain at the Darlington Nuclear site until 2088. Should the Ontario government order OPG to construct hardened storage facilities at the Darlington site to store this waste for the next 60 years?

Yes, absolutely
Maybe if it has the money
No, the current commercial-style warehouses it uses are fine

Vote Results

Should Ontario Power Generation (OPG) be allowed to expand conventional storage warehouses to store deadly radioactive waste on the shore of Lake Ontario or should it be required to build above-ground, attack-resistant, reinforced concrete vaults to store this waste?

The Nuclear Waste Management Organization says radioactive waste will remain at the Darlington Nuclear site until 2088. Should the Ontario government order OPG to construct hardened storage facilities at the Darlington site to store this waste for the next 60 years?

ADDRESS

EMAIL

PHONE