Page 32 of 35
Coal-Free Ontario with Morgan Freeman
The leadership of the Ontario Clean Air Alliance in helping Ontario to become the first
April 20, 2016
Close the old and dangerous Pickering Nuclear Station – Sign the Petition
Close the old and dangerous Pickering Nuclear Station when its licence expires – Sign the
April 4, 2016
Shutting Pickering white elephant would create 16,000 jobs — and lower our electricity rates
March 29, 2016 Shutting Pickering white elephant would create 16,000 jobs — and lower our electricity
March 29, 2016
Decommissioning Pickering Station can create thousands of jobs and save millions
Shutting down the Pickering Nuclear Station in 2018 and proceeding immediately with decommissioning will produce thousands of jobs, save millions of dollars and increase safety for millions of surrounding residents.

March 28, 2016
We don’t need power from Pickering to keep the lights on
Ontario now has a large power surplus — the province now exports more power than is
March 23, 2016
Wind power prices dropping below nuke re-build costs in Ontario
Today Ontario’s Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) announced that it has signed five contracts with
March 10, 2016
Pickering: Highest cost nuclear plant in North America
According to OPG’s Nuclear Benchmarking Report (2015), Pickering’s operating costs per kWh, exclusive of fuel
March 7, 2016
Pickering: The 5th largest nuclear plant in North America on our doorstep
Bruce (Bruce County, Ontario): 6,232 MW Palo Verde (Phoenix, Arizona): 4,212 MW Darlington (Clarington, Ontario):
Pickering design flaw: Like engine accelerating when you step on the brakes
The separation of coolant and moderator has created a positive void coefficient of reactivity —
February 24, 2016
Pickering Nuclear Station – old and dangerous
Oldest nuclear reactors North America Ginna – Wayne County, New York – 1970 (Exelon seeking
Federal funds can help Ontario and Quebec prosper
The David Suzuki Foundation, Equiterre and the Ontario Clean Air Alliance are calling on the Government of Canada to invest in electricity transmission system upgrades to allow increased electricity trade between Quebec and Ontario, which can lead to lower electricity rates and GHG emissions for Ontario and higher export revenues for Quebec.

February 17, 2016
Le financement de projets d’infrastructure par le gouvernement fédéral pourrait contribuer à réduire les coûts d’électricité en Ontario et à augmenter les recettes pour le Québec
Lettre aux ministres Morneau et Sohi signée par la Fondation David Suzuki, Équiterre et OCAA
February 16, 2016
Federal infrastructure funding can help lower power costs for Ontario and raise revenues for Quebec
David Suzuki Foundation, Equiterre & OCAA Letter to Morneau & Sohi February 17, 2016 –
Pickering Nuclear: Unsafe at any speed
The Pickering Nuclear Station has a long history of operational problems, accidents and poor performance.
January 29, 2016
Letter from Dr. F. R. Greening to Energy Minister Chiarelli Re: Darlington re-build project
Dear Minister Chiarelli, I am writing this email as a former OPG research scientist to document a
January 27, 2016
How Ontario phased out coal (video)
This video features interviews with key players in the campaign to phase out coal in Ontario.

January 20, 2016
Darlington Re-Build will raise electricity rates — even before the cost overruns hit
Despite official hype that electricity from a re-built Darlington Nuclear Station will be a good
January 11, 2016
Ontario Power Generation to refurbish Darlington reactors
The Globe and MailJanuary 11, 2016Canadian Press Ontario Power Generation to refurbish Darlington reactors Ontario
Ontario urged to abandon $13-billion nuclear reactors rebuild
CTV NewsJanuary 4, 2016Keith Leslie Ontario urged to abandon $13-billion nuclear reactors rebuild TORONTO —
January 4, 2016
Does Bruce Nuclear re-build make sense?
The OCAA’s review of the Ontario Government’s contract with Bruce Power to rebuild up to six reactors finds that the stated cost of the contract is really only a preliminary estimate. What happens when costs inevitably balloon beyond initial estimates (as they have for every nuclear project in Ontario’s history) is largely unknown

Page 32 of 35